|
http://dcoombs.ca/nitlog/?m=200807#22
Photographic Limbo
(No, not in the how-low-can-you-go sense. This is an altogether much more
directionless kind of limbo.)
So here, o seeker of things, is the thing. I have this camera, see.
I've had it for 4 years and 8 days. That's an awfully long time to have a
camera and not get seriously annoyed at it. Perhaps unsurprisingly, then,
I've been getting seriously annoyed at it for much of the time I've had it.
So, while it still works about as well as it ever did, I don't use it as
much as I would like to because it's so inconvenient.
Time for a new camera.
Irrelevant
Among my gripes is not resolution. Everybody gets hung up on how
many millions of pixels their camera has. Since I almost never enlarge a
photo to fit on posterboard, I just don't really care about that. I am
more concerned with the process of taking photos.
Whatever I get will surely have higher resolution than what I have now.
How much higher, I don't care in the slightest.
I also don't really care about LiveView. Feel free to try to convince me
of its merits. I admit to being curious. But I'm not convinced I'd really
use it.
Do Not Want
I Do Not Want the things I've been getting seriously annoyed at my current
camera for. It's slow: slow to shoot, slow to do anything when its teeny
tiny buffer gets full, painfully horrifyingly slow to scroll through
photos taken using the playback interface. I can't choose the metering
mode. I can't choose the autofocus mode. I am sick of having to remove
sensor dust. I can't change the shutter speed and aperture in manual mode
without holding down buttons while turning dials and wincing in pain at the
requisite contortion.
Want
I want a 35 mm full frame sensor, so I can use wide-angle lenses
effecively. I want sensor-dust auto-cleaning. I want all the
customizability that was removed from the Rebel. I want something that's
pretty much indestructible.
Options
As I see it, I can wait an undetermined number of months to see what Canon
is going to announce as a successor to its EOS 5D. Or, I could wait, say,
two weeks and get a Nikon D700.
Switching brands is not necessarily heretical. Brand loyalty isn't really
my style anyway: I want something practical and good. I haven't invested
that much in lenses: I have the EF 28-135 USM/IS and the EF 50
f/1.4, both of which are decent, but neither of which was spectacularly
expensive. I'm sure they could find a good home, even used.
I'd have to learn a new interface, but I'm sure it would only feel weird
for a while and then it would be fine. (I use vi; I'm sure I can figure
out a Nikon.)
What concerns me is lenses. While it's neat that Nikon's range of new and
old lenses are interoperable to varying degrees with camera bodies new and
old, and while it's awesome that they are generally very solidly
constructed, it is my impression (and maybe I'm wrong) that Canon's are a
little better optically, particularly the primes. And certainly there are
more Canon lenses with more modern autofocus systems than Nikon lenses.
There is also dilu's recent escapade
with her self-destructing Canon EF-S 17-85 USM/IS lens, and Canon customer
service's utterly
bewildering replies. It's a factor. Stuff happens.
So: do I wait a completely undetermined length of time to get some yet
unannounced product I at least know will be familiar and I will like,
understand, and be able to use my current lenses with, or do I get
something (basically) right away (!!), which I don't know as well but might
end up loving, and commit myself to that for a while?
Opinions welcome.
|